On 18 February 2014 11:16, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > Il 18/02/2014 12:09, Peter Maydell ha scritto: > >> > No, we've had that topic before: It's your job as submitter and >> > maintainer to flag that appropriately in the commit message, as per QEMU >> > Summit 2012. >> >> I don't think this workflow works. I have no idea what >> stable's criteria are, and if you rely on people >> adding a cc you're going to miss stuff. > > > There isn't really a standard criterion. It's up to each maintainer to be > stricter or looser on what goes to stable.
My criteria for ARM in the past has typically been "there's a new release every three months, anything that got past the release testing process for release N is sufficiently non-critical it can just go into release N+1". thanks -- PMM
