On 03/04/2014 01:43 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 03/01/2014 10:33 AM, Chen Gang wrote: >> Patch 1/3: move v9fs_string_free() to below "err_out:" >> >> Patch 2/3: use snprintf() instead of sprintf() >> (which will be replaced of by Path 3/3) >> >> Patch 3/3: use g_strdup_printf() instead of PATH_MAX limitation > > By sending this series as a deeply nested reply (14 References: > listings), it's harder to note that it is an independent series. It's > best to send your 0/N cover letter as a new top-level thread, rather > than burying it an existing thread. >
OK, thanks. My current 0/N patch is almost useless, it really should/need provide some more useful information. Next time, when I send a new series, I shall/need reference the 0/N cover letter of another members' series, firstly. Thanks -- Chen Gang Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed
