On 03/07/2014 08:43 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 07/03/2014 10:37, Mark Wu ha scritto:
>> Before spapr_vga_init will returned false if the vga is specified by
>> the command '-device VGA' because vga_interface_type was evaluated to
>> VGA_NONE. With the change in previous patch of this series,
>> spapr_vga_init should return true if it's told that the vga will be
>> initialized in flow of the generic devices initialization.
>>
>> This patch also makes two cleanups:
>> 1. skip initialization for VGA_NONE
>> 2. remove the useless 'break'
> 
> I think that after this patch, "-nodefaults -device VGA" will get a USB 
> controller that it didn't get before.


I suspect what was meant by "the machine not aware of the graphics device"
 is that the guest won't work with VGA and without keyboard (default
console will be vga + keyboard and not serial) which is USB and this is why
the patch is trying to add USB.


> 
> Perhaps this in vl.c:
> 
> bool usb_enabled(bool default_usb)
> {
>     return qemu_opt_get_bool(qemu_get_machine_opts(), "usb", default_usb);
> }
> 
> should be
> 
> bool usb_enabled(bool default_usb)
> {
>     return qemu_opt_get_bool(qemu_get_machine_opts(), "usb",
>                              !no_defaults && default_usb);
> }
> 
> ?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paolo
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Wu <wu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  hw/ppc/spapr.c | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>> index 93d02c1..4d0ac56 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>> @@ -765,13 +765,15 @@ static int spapr_vga_init(PCIBus *pci_bus)
>>  {
>>      switch (vga_interface_type) {
>>      case VGA_NONE:
>> +        return false;
>> +    case VGA_DEVICE:
>> +        return true;
>>      case VGA_STD:
>>          return pci_vga_init(pci_bus) != NULL;
>>      default:
>>          fprintf(stderr, "This vga model is not supported,"
>>                  "currently it only supports -vga std\n");
>>          exit(0);
>> -        break;
>>      }
>>  }
>>  
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Alexey

Reply via email to