* Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org) wrote:
> On 11 March 2014 16:13, Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > * Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org) wrote:
> >> Can we have a configure test for the function instead, please?
> >> We don't generally do tests for specific glibc versions
> >> (among other things, glibc is not the only C library we
> >> might be compiled against -- consider MacOSX, the BSDs,
> >> and occasionally somebody tries to compile against one
> >> of the embedded libcs).
> >
> > Except pthread_setname_np is not portable and was previously
> > ifdef'd _GNU_SOURCE anyway
>
> I still think it's a generally worse way to do checks.
> We currently have only one check against __GLIBC_MINOR__
> in the tree (and that's in extremely Linux-specific
> code).
>
> > the parameters on other OSs
> > maybe different (freebsd has got a 3rd parameter for no
> > apparent reason).
>
> This rather suggests we should abstract the "set thread
> name" functionality out into its own function so we
> can easily provide other implementations for those
> other OSes later.
OK, well there is already a
void os_set_proc_name(const char *s)
in os-posix.c but it has ~2 problems:
1) If the OS doesn't support doing it that way it exit(1)'s
2) it uses prctl to set it on the current thread, where
pthread_setname_np has the advantage that it sets it on
something you have a pthread* for.
3) There isn't a matching entry in os-win32.c
is the best thing to add another function to os-posix and os-win
then?
Dave
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
