On Di, 2014-03-11 at 12:58 -0400, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:46:17AM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > > I would suggest being "bug for bug" compatible in the first set of > > patches, and then add patches on top to add the additional > > functionality. Just my 2 cents.
Makes sense indeed. > With the patch enclosed at the end of this email, I can get it > down to this: Just move patch #1 to the end of the series. So we first switch over table by table, generating output identical to current seabios, then go fix/improve things on top of that. That way it'll be easier to bisect problems in case any show up. cheers, Gerd
