On 03/14/2014 01:18 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:

>>>  
>>> +void qmp_dirty_bitmap_add(const char *device, const char *name,
>> Do we want this to work on node-names too ?
> 
> I think having dirty bitmap on device is good enough for now. If there is a
> necessity we can add on top.

How would anything other than the active image ever be dirty?  If only
the active image can be written, then having it only operate on device
name is fine, because there is no point in using any node name other
than the one of the active layer, but that has a device name.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to