Il 27/03/2014 03:21, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
This defines and makes use of an NMI interface in order to support
the "nmi" command.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <a...@ozlabs.ru>
---
hw/ppc/spapr.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
index 62ddb4d..495fa88 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
#include "hw/pci/pci.h"
#include "hw/scsi/scsi.h"
#include "hw/virtio/virtio-scsi.h"
+#include "hw/nmi.h"
#include "exec/address-spaces.h"
#include "hw/usb.h"
@@ -1539,13 +1540,36 @@ static char *spapr_get_fw_dev_path(FWPathProvider *p,
BusState *bus,
return NULL;
}
+static void spapr_do_nmi(void *arg)
+{
+ CPUState *cs = arg;
+ PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(cs);
+ CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
+
+ cpu_synchronize_state(cs);
+ env->spr[SPR_SRR0] = env->nip;
+ env->spr[SPR_SRR1] = env->msr;
+ env->nip = 0x100;
+ env->msr = (1ULL << MSR_SF) | (1 << MSR_ME);
+ if (env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_ILE) {
+ env->msr |= 1 << MSR_LE;
+ }
+}
I think an interface isn't the right tool here. You want a method in
CPUClass, and you also should move the existing code for x86 and s390 to
target-i386 and target-s390.
Paolo