> Am 02.04.2014 um 07:36 schrieb Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de>: > > > >> Am 02.04.2014 um 07:23 schrieb Hervé Poussineau <hpous...@reactos.org>: >> >> Le mer. 02 avril 2014 07:14:48 CEST, Alexander Graf a écrit : >>> >>> >>>> Am 01.04.2014 um 23:18 schrieb Hervé Poussineau <hpous...@reactos.org>: >>>> >>>> This is easier to do this than to copy the code from the wrong entry point >>>> to the right entry point. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Hervé Poussineau <hpous...@reactos.org> >>>> --- >>>> src/vectors.S | 7 ++++++- >>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/src/vectors.S b/src/vectors.S >>>> index 691d568..05cd1d9 100644 >>>> --- a/src/vectors.S >>>> +++ b/src/vectors.S >>>> @@ -121,7 +121,12 @@ excp_##entry##: >>>> ; \ >>>> >>>> /* Exception vectors */ >>>> /* Reset exception */ >>>> - EXCP_BUG(0100) ; >>>> +.org 0x0100 >>>> +excp_0100: >>>> + lis r3,0 >>>> + addi r3,r3,-4 >>>> + mtlr r3 >>>> + blr >>> >>> Doesn't ba -4 work? >> >> Yes, "ba -4" also works, I just tested it. > > It's a lot cleaner because it doesn't modify registers. I don't think this is > 2.0 material either - we're in the "critical bug fixes only" phase already, > so no need to rush :).
Oh, and writing it as ba 0xfffffffc should work as well and be even clearer :) Alex
