On 7 April 2014 12:47, Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> wrote: > Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: >> I'm really not a fan of this kind of single patch that >> touches a huge number of files at once. They're basically >> impossible to review and they introduce the possibility >> of conflicts between submaintainer tree changes and the >> big patch. There's no reason to have all these changes >> in a single patch -- I'd much rather see one patch per >> subsystem sent to the relevant submaintainers, plus >> one for all the unmaintained stuff which can go via >> the migration tree. > > If you say how to split, I am all for it.
Like I said, one patch per maintained subsystem, one patch for the leftovers. thanks -- PMM
