On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 03:58:01PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 01/06/2010 03:55 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >>> Well, we can freeze qemu64 if we wish. That's still not 100% accurate >>> since kvm can remove features from qemu64. >>> >>> -cpu none,+flags,vendor=foo,cache=bar,ad=nauseum? >>> >> I'd rather add a "kvm" cpu and leave the qemu64 one to qemu tcg features. >> > > We can probably default -enable-kvm to -cpu host, as long as we explain > very carefully that if users wish to preserve cpu features across > upgrades, they can't depend on the default.
Hardware upgrades or software upgrades? > -- > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
