Am 04.05.2014 um 05:31 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: > If the very first allocation has a length of 0, the free_cluster_index > is still 0 after the for loop, which means that subtracting one from it > will underflow and signal an invalid range of clusters by returning > -EFBIG. However, there is no such range, as its length is 0. > > Fix this by preventing underflows on free_cluster_index during the > check. > > Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com>
Heh, I wondered about this when I reviewed that other patch, and came to the conclusion that it probably doesn't happen. Did you find a case where it does happen in fact? Anyway, this can't hurt: Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com>
