On 05/09/2014 12:34 PM, Paul Durrant wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Campbell
Sent: 09 May 2014 17:12
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Cc: Ross Philipson; ke...@koconnor.net; Huangweidong (C); Hanweidong
(Randy); m...@redhat.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; xen-
de...@lists.xen.org; fabio.fant...@m2r.biz;
johannes.kra...@googlemail.com; Gonglei (Arei); Stefano Stabellini;
Gaowei (UVP); Jan Beulich; Anthony Perard; Paul Durrant
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] Hvmloader: Modify ACPI to only supply
_EJ0 methods for PCIslots that support hotplug by runtime patching
On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 12:00 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
So we could just then gat the _EJ0 functionality based on values that
are present (or not) in the SSDT ?
AIUI the very presence of _EJ0 is what marks the device as being
ejectable (e.g. in the Windows device manager).
It would be possible to make _EJ0 conditionally turn itself into a NOP
without resorting to an SSDT, but I don't think that solves the issue
they are trying to solve, which is that the user can even try to eject
an non-hotplug device. (grep for UAR1 in our dsdt.asl and
acpi_info->com1_present in hvmloader/acpi/build.c for an example of this
sort of conditional thing)
Going back to the SSDT idea. A little poking around and what not and I
came up with something like this that I build into an SSDT:
DefinitionBlock ("SSDTX.aml", "SSDT", 2, "Xen", "HVM", 0)
{
/* S00 device is defined in DSDT, this allows me to
* refrence it in this SSDT
*/
External (\_SB.PCI0.S00, DeviceObj)
...
/* Extend the functionality of S00 */
Scope ( \_SB.PCI0.S00 ) {
Method(_EJ0, 1, NotSerialized)
{
/* Do stuffs here */
}
}
}
So I did find some examples of this after all in my pile of ACPI
firmware snapshots from all our supported platforms. I think this would
work allowing you to just add or not add _EJ0 methods to the PCI devices
you want by either using different SSDTs or doing something to generate
or munge the SSDT at runtime (which would be simpler than messing with
the DSDT I think. I did not try it (actually I did but ran into other
problems on our platform :).
Yes, ejectable is only part of it. If there's appropriate AML for the slot, it
is enough to indicate that a device is removable. I found the following link to
an old M$ doc describing hotplug PCI:
http://www.microsoft.com/china/whdc/system/pnppwr/hotadd/hotplugpci.mspx.
(There's a load of Chinese characters surrounding the doc, but the body is in
English).
Paul
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4570 / Virus Database: 3931/7443 - Release Date: 05/05/14
--
Ross Philipson
