On (Tue) Jan 12 2010 [19:35:08], Blue Swirl wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Amit Shah <amit.s...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Here's a run of the clang analyzer on qemu sources for the x86_64 > > target. > > > > See > > > > http://amitshah.fedorapeople.org/clang-output/2010-01-12-9/ > > > > for the results. > > > > There are a few results there which look dubious but a lot of the output > > can be useful to fix the bugs. > > > > What's nice about the tool is that the output is the source code > > annotated with the branch decisions that were taken to point out to the > > case where a bug would be triggered. > > > > Doing this for all the targets takes a really long time plus lots of > > disk space (I stopped the compile at 400M of clang output). > > > > If there's interest in this kind of result, I can post a link to the > > list every week or so. However, some bugs reported make it slightly less > > appealing as real bugs could get lost in the noise. > > I'd be very interested in the results of Sparc32 and Sparc64 analyses.
OK, I added the two targets to the run and got the following result: http://amitshah.fedorapeople.org/clang-output/2010-01-13-1/ The bug count went up from 95 for just x86-64 to 131. However, a lot of these are dups as files get recompiled for each target. Amit