On 6 May 2014 07:08, Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.igles...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.igles...@xilinx.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.igles...@xilinx.com>
> ---
> target-arm/cpu.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target-arm/cpu.h b/target-arm/cpu.h
> index 34e8f7c..88dfdcb 100644
> --- a/target-arm/cpu.h
> +++ b/target-arm/cpu.h
> @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ typedef struct CPUARMState {
> uint32_t c9_pminten; /* perf monitor interrupt enables */
> uint64_t mair_el1;
> #define VBAR_EL_IDX(x) (x - 1)
> - uint64_t vbar_el[1]; /* vector base address register */
> + uint64_t vbar_el[3]; /* vector base address register */
> uint32_t c13_fcse; /* FCSE PID. */
> uint64_t contextidr_el1; /* Context ID. */
> uint64_t tpidr_el0; /* User RW Thread register. */
> --
> 1.8.3.2
You should just fold this into whichever patch causes us to
start actually accessing vbar_el[] for other ELs.
thanks
-- PMM
