Luiz Capitulino <lcapitul...@redhat.com> writes: > This commit adds the "pci_bridge" key to the PCI device QDict, > it also adds support for printing it in the user protocol. > > IMPORTANT: This code is being added separately because I could > NOT test it properly. According to Michael Tsirkin, it depends > on ultrasparc and it would take time to do the proper setup. > > Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitul...@redhat.com> > --- > hw/pci.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/pci.c b/hw/pci.c > index 8275ceb..d5e4866 100644 > --- a/hw/pci.c > +++ b/hw/pci.c > @@ -1102,6 +1102,7 @@ void pci_for_each_device(PCIBus *bus, int bus_num, > > static void pci_device_print(Monitor *mon, QDict *device) > { > + int class; > QDict *qdict; > QListEntry *entry; > uint64_t addr, size; > @@ -1113,10 +1114,11 @@ static void pci_device_print(Monitor *mon, QDict > *device) > monitor_printf(mon, " "); > > qdict = qdict_get_qdict(device, "class_info"); > + class = qdict_get_int(qdict, "class"); > if (qdict_haskey(qdict, "desc")) { > monitor_printf(mon, "%s", qdict_get_str(qdict, "desc")); > } else { > - monitor_printf(mon, "Class %04" PRId64, qdict_get_int(qdict, > "class")); > + monitor_printf(mon, "Class %d", class); > } > > qdict = qdict_get_qdict(device, "id");
This change seems unrelated. Is it intentional? [...]