On Tue, Jan 19, 2010, Laurent Vivier wrote: > Why don't you use "type -P" for "path_of" ?"
I don't think that's portable enough: $ sh -c 'type -P ls' -P: not found ls is /bin/ls -- Loïc Minier
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010, Laurent Vivier wrote: > Why don't you use "type -P" for "path_of" ?"
I don't think that's portable enough: $ sh -c 'type -P ls' -P: not found ls is /bin/ls -- Loïc Minier