Il 29/05/2014 17:39, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
> It's not the full canonical path, it's basically the id.
>
Fair enough. Although its still redundant though isn't it?
Should we ever clean up messages etc in memory api to include both
owner and name this is going to come out:
"foo/bar/baz:baz"
or some such.
Yeah. But it's not exposed in any way, we can change it later.
Paolo
Then again, if we are only worried about getting a sane shorthand,
perhaps what Igor has done here is a sane default for the memory API
when passed a NULL name?
