Probably simple enough just to check that the value is always zero as I
believe that is what they are likely initialized to.  Perhaps during reset?


On 3 June 2014 08:35, Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote:

>
> Greg Bellows writes:
>
> > On 3 June 2014 05:21, Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Edgar E. Iglesias writes:
> >>
> >> > From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.igles...@xilinx.com>
> >> >
> >> > No functional change.
> >> > Prepares for future additions of the EL2 and 3 versions of this reg.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.igles...@xilinx.com>
> >> > ---
> >> >  target-arm/cpu.c        |  2 +-
> >> >  target-arm/cpu.h        |  2 +-
> >> >  target-arm/helper-a64.c |  4 ++--
> >> >  target-arm/helper.c     | 12 ++++++------
> >> >  4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/target-arm/cpu.c b/target-arm/cpu.c
> >> > index 794dcb9..93bd6a0 100644
> >> > --- a/target-arm/cpu.c
> >> > +++ b/target-arm/cpu.c
> >> > @@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ static void arm1026_initfn(Object *obj)
> >> >          ARMCPRegInfo ifar = {
> >> >              .name = "IFAR", .cp = 15, .crn = 6, .crm = 0, .opc1 = 0,
> >> .opc2 = 1,
> >> >              .access = PL1_RW,
> >> > -            .fieldoffset = offsetofhigh32(CPUARMState, cp15.far_el1),
> >> > +            .fieldoffset = offsetofhigh32(CPUARMState,
> cp15.far_el[1]),
> >> >              .resetvalue = 0
> >> >          };
> >> >          define_one_arm_cp_reg(cpu, &ifar);
> >> > diff --git a/target-arm/cpu.h b/target-arm/cpu.h
> >> > index 8d04385..172a631 100644
> >> > --- a/target-arm/cpu.h
> >> > +++ b/target-arm/cpu.h
> >> > @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ typedef struct CPUARMState {
> >> >          uint32_t ifsr_el2; /* Fault status registers.  */
> >> >          uint64_t esr_el[2];
> >> >          uint32_t c6_region[8]; /* MPU base/size registers.  */
> >> > -        uint64_t far_el1; /* Fault address registers.  */
> >> > +        uint64_t far_el[2]; /* Fault address registers.  */
> >>
> >> If there are EL1, 2 and 3 versions shouldn't this be [3]?
> >>
> >>
> > Or [4]?  Even if we don't use all the EL slots, it would make for more
> > readable and consistent code if we kept the indices consistent with the
> > level value.  Otherwise, as we discussed previously, we end up with
> > different numbering schemes depending on the register.
>
> Makes sense although it would be nice to mark the unused ones somehow
> for debugging.
>
> >
> >
> >> >          uint64_t par_el1;  /* Translation result. */
> >> >          uint32_t c9_insn; /* Cache lockdown registers.  */
> >> >          uint32_t c9_data;
> >> > diff --git a/target-arm/helper-a64.c b/target-arm/helper-a64.c
> >> > index bc153cb..d647441 100644
> >> > --- a/target-arm/helper-a64.c
> >> > +++ b/target-arm/helper-a64.c
> >> > @@ -465,13 +465,13 @@ void aarch64_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
> >> >      }
> >> >
> >> >      env->cp15.esr_el[1] = env->exception.syndrome;
> >> > -    env->cp15.far_el1 = env->exception.vaddress;
> >> > +    env->cp15.far_el[1] = env->exception.vaddress;
> >> >
> >> >      switch (cs->exception_index) {
> >> >      case EXCP_PREFETCH_ABORT:
> >> >      case EXCP_DATA_ABORT:
> >> >          qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_INT, "...with FAR 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
> >> > -                      env->cp15.far_el1);
> >> > +                      env->cp15.far_el[1]);
> >>
> >> As there is no FAR_EL0 shouldn't this be the first in the array (ie. 0?)
> >>
> >
> > See above comment.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> >          break;
> >> >      case EXCP_BKPT:
> >> >      case EXCP_UDEF:
> >> > diff --git a/target-arm/helper.c b/target-arm/helper.c
> >> > index ec031f5..5350a99 100644
> >> > --- a/target-arm/helper.c
> >> > +++ b/target-arm/helper.c
> >> > @@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo v6_cp_reginfo[] = {
> >> >        .access = PL0_W, .type = ARM_CP_NOP },
> >> >      { .name = "IFAR", .cp = 15, .crn = 6, .crm = 0, .opc1 = 0, .opc2
> =
> >> 2,
> >> >        .access = PL1_RW,
> >> > -      .fieldoffset = offsetofhigh32(CPUARMState, cp15.far_el1),
> >> > +      .fieldoffset = offsetofhigh32(CPUARMState, cp15.far_el[1]),
> >> >        .resetvalue = 0, },
> >> >      /* Watchpoint Fault Address Register : should actually only be
> >> present
> >> >       * for 1136, 1176, 11MPCore.
> >> > @@ -1505,7 +1505,7 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo vmsa_cp_reginfo[] = {
> >> >      /* 64-bit FAR; this entry also gives us the AArch32 DFAR */
> >> >      { .name = "FAR_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
> >> >        .opc0 = 3, .crn = 6, .crm = 0, .opc1 = 0, .opc2 = 0,
> >> > -      .access = PL1_RW, .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState,
> >> cp15.far_el1),
> >> > +      .access = PL1_RW, .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState,
> >> cp15.far_el[1]),
> >> >        .resetvalue = 0, },
> >> >      REGINFO_SENTINEL
> >> >  };
> >> > @@ -3414,8 +3414,8 @@ void arm_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
> >> >          /* Fall through to prefetch abort.  */
> >> >      case EXCP_PREFETCH_ABORT:
> >> >          env->cp15.ifsr_el2 = env->exception.fsr;
> >> > -        env->cp15.far_el1 = deposit64(env->cp15.far_el1, 32, 32,
> >> > -                                      env->exception.vaddress);
> >> > +        env->cp15.far_el[1] = deposit64(env->cp15.far_el[1], 32, 32,
> >> > +                                        env->exception.vaddress);
> >> >          qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_INT, "...with IFSR 0x%x IFAR 0x%x\n",
> >> >                        env->cp15.ifsr_el2,
> >> (uint32_t)env->exception.vaddress);
> >> >          new_mode = ARM_CPU_MODE_ABT;
> >> > @@ -3425,8 +3425,8 @@ void arm_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
> >> >          break;
> >> >      case EXCP_DATA_ABORT:
> >> >          env->cp15.esr_el[1] = env->exception.fsr;
> >> > -        env->cp15.far_el1 = deposit64(env->cp15.far_el1, 0, 32,
> >> > -                                      env->exception.vaddress);
> >> > +        env->cp15.far_el[1] = deposit64(env->cp15.far_el[1], 0, 32,
> >> > +                                        env->exception.vaddress);
> >> >          qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_INT, "...with DFSR 0x%x DFAR 0x%x\n",
> >> >                        (uint32_t)env->cp15.esr_el[1],
> >> >                        (uint32_t)env->exception.vaddress);
> >>
> >> --
> >> Alex Bennée
> >>
>
> --
> Alex Bennée
>

Reply via email to