> From: Paolo Bonzini > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 4:40 AM > > Il 03/06/2014 13:29, Stefano Stabellini ha scritto: > >> It's really not your fault, there's not much you can do given the hardware > >> architecture. But I don't think this code can be accepted upstream, sorry. > > > > Yeah, the code is not nice and it is not Tiejun's fault. > > > > Is there any way at all he could change the patch series to make it more > > appealing to you? Or maybe we could having more clearly separated from > > the rest of the codebase? > > I don't know, perhaps a new "-M pc-xen-igd-passthrough" machine type > based on what you're using now (pc-1.6?) but with all the required hacks? >
Note the tricks here are not Xen specific, because it's a driver assumption. If KVM wants to support igd passthrough, same tricks are required too. Thanks Kevin
