Gleb Natapov <g...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 09:14:03PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> From: Kirill A. Shutemov <kir...@shutemov.name>
>>
>> CC block/vvfat.o
>> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
>> block/vvfat.c: In function 'commit_one_file':
>> block/vvfat.c:2259: error: ignoring return value of 'ftruncate', declared
>> with attribute warn_unused_result
>> make: *** [block/vvfat.o] Error 1
>> CC block/vvfat.o
>> In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:912,
>> from ./qemu-common.h:19,
>> from block/vvfat.c:27:
>> In function 'snprintf',
>> inlined from 'init_directories' at block/vvfat.c:871,
>> inlined from 'vvfat_open' at block/vvfat.c:1068:
>> /usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:65: error: call to __builtin___snprintf_chk will
>> always overflow destination buffer
>> make: *** [block/vvfat.o] Error 1
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kir...@shutemov.name>
>> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> block/vvfat.c | 9 +++++++--
>> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/vvfat.c b/block/vvfat.c
>> index 063f731..df957e5 100644
>> --- a/block/vvfat.c
>> +++ b/block/vvfat.c
>> @@ -868,7 +868,8 @@ static int init_directories(BDRVVVFATState* s,
>> {
>> direntry_t* entry=array_get_next(&(s->directory));
>> entry->attributes=0x28; /* archive | volume label */
>> - snprintf((char*)entry->name,11,"QEMU VVFAT");
>> + memcpy(entry->name,"QEMU VVF",8);
>> + memcpy(entry->extension,"AT ",3);
>> }
>>
> Before the change extension was initialized to "AT\0" after it is "AT "
it was paolo who told to do that change. entries are not 0 ended.
that was his explanation.
Later, Juan.
