Hi Greg,
I'm sorry, I wasn't thoughtful enough and missed that.
I would just suggest to combine that functions since they have a common
part, i.e.:
if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL3)) {
...
What do you think?
// Sergey
12.06.2014 20:26, Greg Bellows пишет:
> Hi Sergey,
>
> I think I am missing your point. In patch 6 arm_current_pl calls
> arm_is_secure. Can you elaborate?
>
> Greg
>
>
> On 11 June 2014 07:17, Sergey Fedorov <serge.f...@gmail.com
> <mailto:serge.f...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On 11.06.2014 03:54, Fabian Aggeler wrote:
> > arm_is_secure() function allows to determine CPU security state
> > if the CPU implements Security Extensions/EL3.
> > arm_is_secure_below_el3() returns true if CPU is in secure state
> > below EL3.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sergey Fedorov <s.fedo...@samsung.com
> <mailto:s.fedo...@samsung.com>>
> > Signed-off-by: Fabian Aggeler <aggel...@ethz.ch
> <mailto:aggel...@ethz.ch>>
> > ---
> > target-arm/cpu.h | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/target-arm/cpu.h b/target-arm/cpu.h
> > index 903aa01..cb0da6b 100644
> > --- a/target-arm/cpu.h
> > +++ b/target-arm/cpu.h
> > @@ -710,6 +710,44 @@ static inline int arm_feature(CPUARMState
> *env, int feature)
> > return (env->features & (1ULL << feature)) != 0;
> > }
> >
> > +
> > +/* Return true if exception level below EL3 is in secure state */
> > +static inline bool arm_is_secure_below_el3(CPUARMState *env)
> > +{
> > +#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> > + if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL3)) {
> > + return !(env->cp15.scr_el3 & SCR_NS);
> > + } else if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL2)) {
> > + return false;
> > + } else {
> > + /* IMPDEF: QEMU defaults to non-secure */
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > +#else
> > + return false;
> > +#endif
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Return true if the processor is in secure state */
> > +static inline bool arm_is_secure(CPUARMState *env)
> > +{
> > +#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> > + if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL3)) {
> > + if (env->aarch64 && extract32(env->pstate, 2, 2) == 3) {
> > + /* CPU currently in Aarch64 state and EL3 */
> > + return true;
> > + } else if (!env->aarch64 &&
> > + (env->uncached_cpsr & CPSR_M) ==
> ARM_CPU_MODE_MON) {
> > + /* CPU currently in Aarch32 state and monitor mode */
> > + return true;
> > + }
>
> Hi Fabian,
>
> Why don't use arm_current_pl() from patch 6 to determine EL here?
>
> Best regards,
> Sergey
>
> > + }
> > + return arm_is_secure_below_el3(env);
> > +#else
> > + return false;
> > +#endif
> > +}
> > +
> > /* Return true if the specified exception level is running in
> AArch64 state. */
> > static inline bool arm_el_is_aa64(CPUARMState *env, int el)
> > {
>
>
