On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:52:22AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 10 June 2014 15:03, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > > If the flash device is configured with a device-width which is > > not equal to the bank-width, indicating that it is actually several > > narrow flash devices in parallel, the CFI table should report the > > number of blocks and the size of a single device, not of the whole > > combined setup. This stops Linux from complaining: > > "NOR chip too large to fit in mapping. Attempting to cope..." > > > > As usual, we retain the old broken but backwards compatible behaviour > > when the device-width is not specified. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> > > --- > > At the moment vexpress is the only board which properly sets device-width > > rather than using the back-compat misemulated behaviour... > > Kevin, Stefan: since this only affects ARM boards at > the moment, I'll put this in via target-arm.next unless > you particularly want to put it in through the block queue.
That's fine. Stefan
pgpvp15CnYaP5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
