On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 06:19 -0400, Jidong Xiao wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Vadim Rozenfeld <vroze...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 09:39 +0800, Zhang Haoyu wrote: > >> Hi, Vadim > >> I read the kvm-2012-forum paper < KVM as a Microsoft-compatible > >> hypervisor>, > >> Any update and other references, please? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Zhang Haoyu > >> > >> > > > > Unfortunately, not too much. > > From the the most recent, we have lazy eoi implemented by > > MST and reference time counter. > > > > Best regards, > > Vadim. > > > It looks like that Mircosoft has defined a large number of synthetic > registers in their Hyper-v spec, so ultimately KVM should virtualize > most of these registers, so as to support the Mircosoft Enlightment, > right? > > -Jidong
Yes, but you don't have to support all the Hyper-V features at once. Hypervisor declares supported feature by specifying appropriate flags in Feature identification (0x40000003) and Implementation recommendations (0x40000004)CPUID leaves. Best regards, Vadim. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
