On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 11:30:19AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 07/01/2014 11:23 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On 1 July 2014 18:50, Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote: > >> Which glibc version? Better yet, could you throw preprocessed source > >> my way? UP1000 box is not in a good shape and I'd rather avoid trying to > >> run > >> full glibc builds on it ;-/ > > > > Would a 164LX be a useful (ie non-duplicate) extra resource > > for testing this stuff? That has a 21164 (EV5) in it. I haven't > > tried to boot it for some years, but I can have a try at > > resurrecting it if it would be helpful... > > An ev5 would be a good fallback.
OK, DS10 resurrected and so far seems to be stable (I'll know by tomorrow; there's a possibility that chipset heatsink is dodgy, but so far it seems to be doing OK). That gives us a EV6 box. Which glibc version it is? I don't see such failures with your axp/axp-next (head at 6b38f4e7f); could you post the details on your reproducer? I've tried to guess the likely version by glibc.git, but I don't see nearbyint tests with such argument in any version there, so I couldn't find it that way...
