On 07/03/2014 01:10 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > c4177479 "spapr: make sure RMA is in first mode of first memory node" > introduced regression which prevents from running guests with memoryless > NUMA node#0 which may happen on real POWER8 boxes and which would make > sense to debug in QEMU. > > This patchset aim is to fix that and also fix various code problems in > memory nodes generation. > > These 2 patches could be merged (the resulting patch looks rather ugly): > spapr: Use DT memory node rendering helper for other nodes > spapr: Move DT memory node rendering to a helper > > > Alex, there are "numa: enable sparse node numbering ..." patches from Nish, > which set can go first so the other could rebase on top of it? Thanks!
Ping. This is for 2.2 indeed. > > > > Changes: > v3: > * fixed bug with ram_size bigger than the only NUMA node > * fixed bug with 64bit addresses in memory node creation loop > > v2: > * minor cosmetic change in spapr_node0_size() > * spapr_populate_memory() fixed to work in a no-numa config > * patch changing max numa nodes is removed > > Please comment. Thanks! > > > > > Alexey Kardashevskiy (6): > spapr: Move DT memory node rendering to a helper > spapr: Use DT memory node rendering helper for other nodes > spapr: Refactor spapr_populate_memory() to allow memoryless nodes > spapr: Split memory nodes to power-of-two blocks > spapr: Add a helper for node0_size calculation > spapr: Fix ibm,associativity for memory nodes > > hw/ppc/spapr.c | 111 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- > 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) > -- Alexey
