Il 22/07/2014 17:17, Sebastian Tanase ha scritto: >> > That's a bug to fix indeed, then---it should count up from 0 without >> > icount, and icount shouldn't affect this. Thanks for investigating >> > it. > Just to be sure I don't missunderstand, when you say "without icount" > you refer to qemu_icount_bias (aka when the vcpu is inactive), right?
No, I mean without "-icount", i.e. when QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL is just nanoseconds. Paolo
