Il 28/07/2014 09:56, Igor Mammedov ha scritto: >> > It doesn't handle the case of ACPI tables that shrink, which can happen >> > as well. I guess if this ever happens we can just hard-code the table >> > size of the "old" versions to something big enough (64K?) and keep using >> > fine-grained sizing. > That was intentionally omitted in here so far size only goes up from 1.7 to > 2.1. My though was that can enforce minimum size later during 2.2 cycle > Anyway, I'll think more about it, and maybe post additional patch > on top of this to set minimum size if I find a reason for it to be in 2.1.
No, there's no need for it in 2.1. Paolo
