Gordan Bobic wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: > >Gordan Bobic wrote: > >Due to limitations of the x86 architecture, kqemu used to be far a way > >from providing accurate virtualization. > > KVM is subject to the same limitations, though, so that point is a bit > moot.
No, it isn't. The VT/SVM extensions used by KVM support much more accurate virtualisation than the tricks used by kqemu. There are a few bugs and omissions in KVM itself, but for most things it's a high quality virtualisation. -- Jamie
