On 07/17/2014 04:30 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > On 07/15/2014 06:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 14/07/2014 05:17, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >>>>> No, you should politely bother them again. >>> >>> That does not seem helping though :-/ >> >> Sorry. :) >> >> Well, patch 1 is the same as v6 and for the others Cornelia and Alex can >> ack it. It looks good to me though. > > > Let me clarify things here. > > Alex rb'ed to 0/4, Cornelia rb'ed 2/4 and 3/4, so I put Alex's rb to > 1&2&3&4&5, Cornelia's rb to 2&3, rebase it on top of the current upstream, > repost after 2.1 is released and resume annoying people again. Is that > correct? > > This is my current set: > 5/5 pc_piix: Migrate to new NMI interface > 4/5 spapr: Add support for new NMI interface > 3/5 s390x: Migrate to new NMI interface > 2/5 s390x: Convert QEMUMachine to MachineClass > 1/5 cpus: Define callback for QEMU "nmi" command
Alex, ping. ps. anecdot. "what is your problem?" "doctor, everybody ignores me" "ah I see. next patient, please" :) -- Alexey