On (Thu) 21 Aug 2014 [23:57:46], Peter Lieven wrote: > > Am 11.07.2014 um 14:52 schrieb Amit Shah <amit.s...@redhat.com>: > > > On (Wed) 09 Jul 2014 [12:00:13], Peter Maydell wrote: > >> On 9 July 2014 11:56, Amit Shah <amit.s...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>> On (Wed) 09 Jul 2014 [11:50:18], Peter Maydell wrote: > >>>> OK; we're treating those as bugs so yes, I think this is 2.1 > >>>> material. Has somebody other than the original author tested > >>>> it? (That's a step that would usually be done by Juan as the > >>>> maintainer.) If somebody can provide a Tested-by: I'm happy > >>>> to apply it to master. > >>> > >>> Not really sure if Juan did that as part of his 'thanks, applied' > >>> workflow, but I'll run this through the autotest migration tests and > >>> report back. > >> > >> Thanks; it seems better to double-check given where we are in > >> the release cycle. > > > > I tested using the autotest migration tests, which start a guest, > > migrate it, and then login to the guest to see if everything's fine. > > > > I used qemu-2.0 and qemu.git against qemu.git+patch and both tests > > passed fine. > > > > But since Peter and Eric have reservations, let's just postpone this > > till 2.2. That saves me from further tests as well! > > Since 2.1 is out meanwhile can you please send a pull request for this > patch now?
Juan is back, I'll let him pick it through his tree. Thanks, Amit