On 22 August 2014 12:45, Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> wrote: > On 22.08.14 13:44, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 22 August 2014 12:42, Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> wrote: >>> Or we drop the AND and and the <0 check and treat arg1 as unsigned ;). >> >> That probably just requires equally many changes to >> code that is currently correct because the arg* are >> signed but would need changes if they became unsigned. > > Well, I do have a downstream patch that makes them unsigned, so I'd > rather like to make the code as stable to that as I can ;).
Yeah, I know. When I was looking through your patch tree I saw that one and my reaction was "why on earth did you do that?"... -- PMM
