Il 27/08/2014 12:48, Pavel Dovgaluk ha scritto:
>> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com]
>> Il 27/08/2014 12:30, Pavel Dovgaluk ha scritto:
>>>> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com]
>>>> Il 27/08/2014 12:15, Pavel Dovgaluk ha scritto:
>>>>>>> Again, this is only needed in your record/replay system (and you haven't
>>>>>>> yet quite explained why the design has this limitation), so it should
>>>>>>> not be a part of this series.
>>>>>   I see. Updating s->timer and s->TimerExpire in post_load will be enough?
>>>>
>>>> In theory it should be done already, I guess it's not deterministic
>>>> enough though.
>>>
>>> I split existing function into the two parts: one sets irq (and calls 
>>> another).
>>> And the second part sets only timer and TimerExpire fields. The second 
>>> function
>>> is also called from post_load.
>>>
>>>> Have you tried my patch to rewrite the timer stuff?
>>>
>>> What patch do you mean?
>>
>> This one:
>>
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/288521
> 
> It will solve the problem, because it removes raising an irq from 
> rtl8139_set_next_tctr_time function.
> 
> Ok then, I'll remove my rtl8139 patch from the series.

Please include that patch in your record/replay work though.  I'm not
sure if I'll have time to test it and submit it.

Paolo


Reply via email to