On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:54:01PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 08:52:00PM +0400, Andrey Korolyov wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosa...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 10:51:38PM +0400, Andrey Korolyov wrote: > > >> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Andrey Korolyov <and...@xdel.ru> wrote: > > >> > On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> > > >> > wrote: > > >> >> Il 24/08/2014 18:19, Andrey Korolyov ha scritto: > > >> >>> Sorry, I was a bit inaccurate in my thoughts at Fri about necessary > > >> >>> amount of work, patch lays perfectly on 3.10 with bit of monkey > > >> >>> rewrites. The attached one fixed problem for me - it represents > > >> >>> 0b10a1c87a2b0fb459baaefba9cb163dbb8d3344, > > >> >>> 0bc830b05c667218d703f2026ec866c49df974fc, > > >> >>> 44847dea79751e95665a439f8c63a65e51da8e1f and > > >> >>> 673f7b4257a1fe7b181e1a1182ecc2b6b2b795f1. > > >> >> > > >> >> So, with these changes, Marcelo's patch does not hang up your guest > > >> >> anymore? > > >> >> > > >> >> Paolo > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > If I may reword, Marcelo`s proposed states sync with revert-revert of > > >> > agraf`s patch, does not break anything for Windows (migration works > > >> > well for any variant of emulator with modified kernel modules). Let me > > >> > check if initially reported issue (lost I/O interrupts) is gone for > > >> > the current situation (patched kernel plus Marcelo` patch). > > >> > > >> > > >> patched kernel + any 2.1 variant + Windows = works > > >> patched kernel + patched 2.1 + Linux + disk workload = works fine > > > > > > Andrey, > > > > > > What patch is this again ? > > > > > > > > > > It is attached to the message which has a highest quoting order above > > 1), basically it is a monkey adaptation of newer ioapic patches for > > 3.10. RH kernel includes them, so Centos7/RH7 users should not observe > > reported problem. > > > > [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg252526.html > > > > Using the opportunity - what are plans, if there are any, to revive > > agraf`s patch which was the reason of an initial issue in this thread? > > The Windows issue is most probably unrelated to it and I`d be happy to > > check patch proposals because there are a lot of suffering with VMs > > with large uptime and live migration when negative time shift appears. > > I'll try to confirm via Marcin's testcase (vfio+VM migration on Linux > guests), > that the proposed patch is fixing the issue. > > Getting a BSOD on Win2008-R2-x64 while trying to install virtio-win > driver (viostor related BSOD).
What version of virtio-win are you using?