On 02/19/2010 07:49 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Anthony Liguori<anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
On 02/15/2010 10:19 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
The current implementation of alloc_refcount_block and grow_refcount_table has
fundamental problems regarding error handling. There are some places where an
I/O error means that the image is going to be corrupted. I have found that the
only way to fix this is to completely rewrite the thing.
Just sending as an RFC to the list hasn't generated a lot of comments (to be
precise, not a single one). This is a critical part of qcow2 and needs reviews.
So let's try it another way: People in CC, please give it a review. Sooner or
later some of you will need to do so anyway.
Should I apply this series? I still don't see any review comments.
I sent review comments on the 18th. I expect Kevin to address them. I
talked with him on irc while doing the review (i.e. he knows about
them).
You're right, I missed it. Thanks.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Kevin???
Later, Juan.
