On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Lo?c Minier wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010, malc wrote: > > For instance this: > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2005-06/msg00112.html > > > > The builtins are too coarse grained and will do more stuff than strictly > > necessary. > > Is this the case of the builtins I'm proposing to use? We could ask > for new ones without the drawbacks if any. > > Do you have another option to implement locking on thumb-2?
No, i'm against using locking GCC builtins for all the other targets (well PPC), if they provide satisfactory results for thumb-2 please do submit an updated patch which uses them only for this host. -- mailto:av1...@comtv.ru
