On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Cc'ing Gerd for additional chardev expertise.
>
> Zifei Tong <zifeit...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> After commit 812c1057f6175ac9a9829fa2920a2b5783814193 (Handle G_IO_HUP
>> in tcp_chr_read for tcp chardev), the connection is disconnected when in
>> G_IO_HUP condition.
>>
>> However, it's possible that the channel is in G_IO_IN condition at the
>> same time, meaning there is data for reading. In that case, the
>> remaining data is not handled.
>>
>> I saw a related bug when running socat in write-only mode, with
>>
>> $ echo "quit" | socat -u - UNIX-CONNECT:qemu-monitor
>>
>> the monitor won't not run the 'quit' command.
>
> Reproduced.
>
> Is this a regression caused by command 812c105?
The first bad commit is cdaa86 ("Add G_IO_HUP handler for socket
chardev"), which is reverted and reimplemented by 812c105.
>> CC: Kirill Batuzov <batuz...@ispras.ru>
>> CC: Nikolay Nikolaev <n.nikol...@virtualopensystems.com>
>> CC: Anthony Liguori <aligu...@amazon.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Zifei Tong <zifeit...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> qemu-char.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/qemu-char.c b/qemu-char.c
>> index 1a8d9aa..5018c3a 100644
>> --- a/qemu-char.c
>> +++ b/qemu-char.c
>> @@ -2706,7 +2706,7 @@ static gboolean tcp_chr_read(GIOChannel *chan,
>> GIOCondition cond, void *opaque)
>> uint8_t buf[READ_BUF_LEN];
>> int len, size;
>>
>> - if (cond & G_IO_HUP) {
>> + if (!(cond & G_IO_IN) && (cond & G_IO_HUP)) {
>> /* connection closed */
>> tcp_chr_disconnect(chr);
>> return TRUE;
>
> Kirill, you added the code being changed. Could you review the patch?
