Benoît Canet <benoit.ca...@nodalink.com> writes:
>> +DriveInfo *blk_legacy_dinfo(BlockBackend *blk)
>> +{
>> + return blk->legacy_dinfo;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Set @blk's DriveInfo to @dinfo, and return it.
>> + * @blk must not have a DriveInfo set already.
>
>> + * No other BlockBackend may have the same DriveInfo set.
> Must we try to assert this ?
> This would require an extra linked list traversal but I don't think it's a
> performance path anyway.
Must, no. We could.
However, the obvious
assert(!blk_by_legacy_dinfo(dinfo);
doesn't work, because blk_by_legacy_dinfo() asserts it returns a
non-null value. Either we sacrifice that assertion, or we duplicate the
search loop here (yuck), or we factor it out into a helper function. I
don't particularly like either of the three. But if you guys really
want the precondition checked, I'll check it.
> Reviewed-by: Benoît Canet <benoit.ca...@nodalink.com>
Thanks!
