On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:19:09AM -0800, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> When we signal a CpU exception for coprocessor 0, we should indicate
> that it's for coprocessor 0 instead of coprocessor 1.
Thanks applied.
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Froyd <froy...@codesourcery.com>
> ---
> target-mips/translate.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target-mips/translate.c b/target-mips/translate.c
> index dfea6f6..f3522f5 100644
> --- a/target-mips/translate.c
> +++ b/target-mips/translate.c
> @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ static inline void gen_op_addr_add (DisasContext *ctx,
> TCGv ret, TCGv arg0, TCGv
> static inline void check_cp0_enabled(DisasContext *ctx)
> {
> if (unlikely(!(ctx->hflags & MIPS_HFLAG_CP0)))
> - generate_exception_err(ctx, EXCP_CpU, 1);
> + generate_exception_err(ctx, EXCP_CpU, 0);
> }
>
> static inline void check_cp1_enabled(DisasContext *ctx)
> --
> 1.6.3.2
>
>
>
>
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
