On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:19:09AM -0800, Nathan Froyd wrote: > When we signal a CpU exception for coprocessor 0, we should indicate > that it's for coprocessor 0 instead of coprocessor 1.
Thanks applied. > Signed-off-by: Nathan Froyd <froy...@codesourcery.com> > --- > target-mips/translate.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target-mips/translate.c b/target-mips/translate.c > index dfea6f6..f3522f5 100644 > --- a/target-mips/translate.c > +++ b/target-mips/translate.c > @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ static inline void gen_op_addr_add (DisasContext *ctx, > TCGv ret, TCGv arg0, TCGv > static inline void check_cp0_enabled(DisasContext *ctx) > { > if (unlikely(!(ctx->hflags & MIPS_HFLAG_CP0))) > - generate_exception_err(ctx, EXCP_CpU, 1); > + generate_exception_err(ctx, EXCP_CpU, 0); > } > > static inline void check_cp1_enabled(DisasContext *ctx) > -- > 1.6.3.2 > > > > -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net