* Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote: > Il 03/10/2014 19:47, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) ha scritto: > > +static int postcopy_ram_sensitise_area(const char *block_name, void > > *host_addr, > > + ram_addr_t offset, ram_addr_t > > length, > > + void *opaque) > > Weird name, and I'm not referring to the British -ise. :) > > Perhaps ram_block_enable_userfault or ram_block_enable_notify? It helps > clarity to limit the use of the "postcopy_ram_" prefix for static function.
Yep, that's fair enough; I'll make it ram_block_enable_notify. Dave > Paolo -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
