Hi Andrey, thank you for your answer. I know I can work around this by specifying a numa node. My question is though is the current behaviour considered to be a bug, or not. And if yes, when it is expected to get fixed.
Thanks, Mikhail On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Andrey Korolyov <and...@xdel.ru> wrote: > Please try to populate basic (single-node) NUMA topology to workaround > this (or specify numa node for dimm). >
