On 10/23/2014 02:09 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 23 October 2014 10:02, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 23 October 2014 09:09, Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> wrote: >>> Applied to trivial (with subject fixup), thanks! >> >> Please don't -- as I said, I have a libvixl update in my queue, >> and these will conflict. I'll apply an appropriate variation of >> this patch to my target-arm tree. > > ...or maybe I just *thought* I'd said that, since I can't find > a mail in this thread where I did; sorry.
You did, in a "v2" version. Which I overlooked really, and tried to apply the original v1 (which has you reviewed-by as a temp. workaround). Oh well.. :) There's quite a lot of noize about these things recently. Not applying it. Thanks, /mjt\
