And I still shall try qemu and kernel distribution for testing. But excuse me, maybe I can not finish within this month, I shall try to finish within next month.
Thanks. 发自我的 iPad > 在 2014年10月22日,上午8:28,Chen Gang <gang.chen.5...@gmail.com> 写道: > > OK, thanks, there are multiple branches in upstream qemu. Sorry > for my original said, and I can only say: for upstream develop > master branch, it does not support microblaze. > > Excuse me, I does not mainly focus on only using qemu, and I > also found another easier way for test microblaze toolchain (use sim of > binutils). So next, I will mainly focus on sim. > > I also met some issues for sim, but I guess, I can analyze it, > maybe also have chances to make patch for it (that is the main > reason why I want to focus on it). > > Thanks. > > Send from Lenovo A788t. > > Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> wrote: > >>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:41:14PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: >>>> On 10/21/14 12:37, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>>> On 10/20/2014 08:23 AM, Chen Gang wrote: >>>>>> On 10/19/2014 10:58 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> This doesn't use devicetree, but the configurations are known to be >>>>>> working >>>>>> with kernel releases all the way back to kernel version 3.10. >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, really it is ! >>>>> >>>>> After try upstream qemu and upstream kernel, for me, neither them can >>>>> work well. For xilinx qemu with xilinux kernel, it should be well, >>>>> although I still met issue below, is what I have done incorrect? >>>> >>>> Difficult to say. >>>> >>>> I use gcc 4.8.0 from kernel.org and qemu 2.1.2 with its default >>>> configuration >>>> for the microblaze big endian target. No idea if that makes a difference, >>>> but I would suggest to start with those. >>>> >>>> For microblazeel I use gcc 4.9.1 built with buildroot 2014.08 for both >>>> kernel and initramfs. Initramfs for that target is built from busybox. >>> >>> OK, thank you very much for your information. >>> >>> But sorry, I have to stop trying, because that is far from upstream qemu >>> and upstream kernel (at present, I have no enough time resource on it). >>> >>> My original goal is "use upstream microblaze qemu to test upstream gcc, >>> binutils and glibc of microblaze". And now I find another ways: "use sim >>> which is in upstream binutils to perform the related test". >> You lost me. qemu 2.1.2 is the upstream qemu, and I do use upstream binutils >> (2.24 if I recall corectly) as well as upstream gcc and upstream kernel. >> Did I indicate otherwise in anything I said ? FWIW, should be able to use >> qemu from distributions without recompiling it. >> >> Thanks, >> Guenter