On 03/11/2014 20:11, Igor Mammedov wrote: >> > Understood. But I think -m slots=too_much is not an important >> > problem. What is problematic is filling those slots, which patch 1 >> > will help with. > From user's pov it's still error, i.e. he asked on CLI for one amount > of hotpluggable slots and couldn't use all of them at runtime.
But he cannot even with your patch, if he was off by just a couple items. So I don't think the improvement is worth the extra complication of the code and the small layering violation. Paolo
