On 11/14/2014 04:31 PM, Bastian Koppelmann wrote:
>
> On 11/11/2014 04:24 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> diff --git a/tci.c b/tci.c
>> index 4711ee4..28292b3 100644
>> --- a/tci.c
>> +++ b/tci.c
>> @@ -506,19 +506,6 @@ uintptr_t tcg_qemu_tb_exec(CPUArchState *env, uint8_t
>> *tb_ptr)
>> tb_ptr += 2;
>> switch (opc) {
>> - case INDEX_op_end:
>> - case INDEX_op_nop:
>> - break;
>> - case INDEX_op_nop1:
>> - case INDEX_op_nop2:
>> - case INDEX_op_nop3:
>> - case INDEX_op_nopn:
>> - case INDEX_op_discard:
>> - TODO();
>> - break;
>> - case INDEX_op_set_label:
>> - TODO();
>> - break;
> Why do you remove the TODO notice for INDEX_op_discard/set_label? Is TCI no
> longer maintained?
Barely. But these opcodes never reach this far anyway, so the todo is bogus.
r~
