On 19 November 2014 07:13, Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com> wrote: > Because which(1) is not always installed, whereas "command -v" is > the more native way to check for a command. > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com> > --- > configure | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/configure b/configure > index 47048f0..986a13d 100755 > --- a/configure > +++ b/configure > @@ -2727,7 +2727,7 @@ fi > if test "$modules" = yes; then > shacmd_probe="sha1sum sha1 shasum" > for c in $shacmd_probe; do > - if which $c >/dev/null 2>&1; then > + if command -v $c >/dev/null 2>&1; then > shacmd="$c" > break > fi
Configure already provides the shell function "has" for checking for existence of a command -- can we just use that? thanks -- PMM
