Am 28.11.2014 um 12:23 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>
> On 28/11/2014 12:21, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> Am 28.11.2014 um 12:14 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>>>> master:
>>>> Run operation 40000000 iterations 12.851414 s, 3112K operations/s, 321ns
>>>> per coroutine
>>>>
>>>> paolo:
>>>> Run operation 40000000 iterations 11.951720 s, 3346K operations/s, 298ns
>>>> per coroutine
>>> Nice. :)
>>>
>>> Can you please try "coroutine: Use __thread … " together, too? I still
>>> see 11% time spent in pthread_getspecific, and I get ~10% more indeed if
>>> I apply it here (my times are 191/160/145).
>> indeed:
>>
>> Run operation 40000000 iterations 10.138684 s, 3945K operations/s, 253ns per
>> coroutine
> Your perf_master2 uses the ring buffer unconditionally, right? I wonder
> if we can use a similar algorithm but with arrays instead of lists...
Why do you set pool_size = 0 in the create path?
When I do the following:
diff --git a/qemu-coroutine.c b/qemu-coroutine.c
index 6bee354..c79ee78 100644
--- a/qemu-coroutine.c
+++ b/qemu-coroutine.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ Coroutine *qemu_coroutine_create(CoroutineEntry *entry)
* and the actual size of alloc_pool. But it is just a
heuristic,
* it does not need to be perfect.
*/
- pool_size = 0;
+ atomic_dec(&pool_size);
QSLIST_MOVE_ATOMIC(&alloc_pool, &release_pool);
co = QSLIST_FIRST(&alloc_pool);
I get:
Run operation 40000000 iterations 9.883958 s, 4046K operations/s, 247ns per
coroutine
