On 19/12/2014 03:59, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> From the original series sent by Andrew, only patch 1/3 was kept. Patch 2/3
> from v1 was replaced by a safer fix. Patch 3/3 was removed because it
> generates
> a warning even on the most common use-case ("-smp <n>" without any extra
> options).
>
> Andrew Jones (1):
> vl: fix max_cpus check
>
> Eduardo Habkost (2):
> vl: Avoid unnecessary 'if' nesting
> vl: Don't silently change topology when all -smp options were set
>
> vl.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
Eduardo, I forgot the status of these patches. Should I just apply
them? If so, can you take care of documenting the changes in the 2.3
release notes?
Paolo
