On 01/10/2015 07:56 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>  #define TARGET_NR_osf_shmat            209
>> +/* this has the usual shmat semantics so give it the name syscall.c expects
>> + * so that our support for it is enabled.
>> + */
>> +#define TARGET_NR_shmat TARGET_NR_osf_shmat

Eh, you could just s/osf_// on this line if you like.
But otherwise looks good.

Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net>


r~

Reply via email to