On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 07:05:47PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 9 January 2015 at 10:16, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> wrote: > > This pull request depends on the previous block pull request which has not > > been > > merged yet. It was sent on Monday, 5th of January (Message-id: > > <1420458696-1885-1-git-send-email-stefa...@redhat.com>). > > > > The following changes since commit 3bd54e576f40f1d5bf45b4828c7316efd76a4db6: > > > > migration/block: fix pending() return value (2015-01-05 11:34:52 +0000) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > git://github.com/stefanha/qemu.git tags/block-pull-request > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 4cba4284918145de66e27959725559f8aaf764ef: > > > > NVMe: Set correct VS Value for 1.1 Compliant Controllers (2015-01-09 > > 10:12:23 +0000) > > I'm confused. You say this pull depends on the other one, but > the emails give the same tag name for both, so I can't pull > the other one first. (In fact, if not for this one failing I > would have applied it under the assumption that it *was* the > previous pullreq...)
I used a script that overwrites the pull request tag. Sorry for the confusion. You can look at the "for you to fetch changes up to 4cba4284918145de66e27959725559f8aaf764ef" lines to identify which commits are part of each pull request. I'm resending a new (combined) revision without the make check-block commit. Stefan
pgptm_qoScVm1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
