On 03/17/2010 11:14 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 10:59 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/08/2010 06:58 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle<pebo...@tiscali.nl>
Applied. Thanks.
Paul Brook was "tempted to replace it by an abort()" (about one and a
half week ago). Did you perhaps miss that message or weren't you tempted
to do this?
I missed it, but then again, I don't think the patch was wrong in the
first place.
I think we use too many aborts/exits in the device model that can
potentially be triggered by guest code.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Regards,
Paul Bolle
